Approved 2/1/2005
Minutes
Present: Athinarayanan, Bertrand, Buis, Cron, Curtis,
Guests: Jai Dahiya (for McGowan), Steve Overmann, Chris Seyer (for Hinkle), Wes Mueller and Shuju Wu
A. Minutes of
B. Action Items
1. Merger of Department of Geosciences
with the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics: (Council
members were previously provided with the handout regarding the merger with the
agenda.) Stephens reminded the
Council that during the re-structuring three (3) years ago, these two
(2) departments retained their identities under one chairperson. This proposal will collapse the separate identities
and the Geosciences program will dissolve into Physics and Engineering
Physics. Upon a motion made by Shaw to
approve the merger, seconded by Prater, the motion was approved unanimously.
2. Revision in B.S. in Environmental Science with the Elimination of Geosciences and Soil Science concentrations and Development of new concentration – Geoprocessing and Soils: (Council members were previously provided a copy of the proposal with the agenda.) Shaw explained that the new concentration was created as a result of the elimination of the Geosciences major. Courses will be offered in alternating years using current manpower, and there will be no decrease in the offering of University Studies classes. Upon a motion by Shaw, seconded by Jones, the motion passed unanimously.
3. B.S. Industrial Technology to Delete Electronics and Computer Technology Option and Add Telecommunications and Computer Networking Option: (Council members were previously provided a copy of the proposal with the agenda.) Shaw moved to approve the motion; Shepard seconded. Seyer (for Hinkle) stated that according to the “60% Rule” in the Bulletin, there were not enough senior level credit hours in 300 level or above. He stated there were only 30 of the 78 hours listed and 60% of hours for a major should be in upper level classes. After some discussion, Jones moved for a friendly amendment and approval with “the understanding that this is an exception to the 60% rule for upper level courses in the major.” Curtis seconded. The motion was approved unanimously. Stephens stated that this issue will need to be looked at and suggested that we review the number of exceptions to the 60% rule that have already been through the approval process.
C. Information Items
1. Actions Taken From Phase I and II Reviews
Stephens stated that program changes presented as a direct result of Phase I or Phase II Reviews already have the approval of the Board of Regents and no action will be needed. Any follow up coming out of the Reviews will then be considered as informational items.
2.
In view of that
information, Shaw informed the Council that the
D. Other
1.
Dahiya announced
that the
2. 120 Hour Implementation
Jones questioned
when the 120 hour degree credit requirement for graduation would take
effect. His question was based on an
e-mail from the Registrar. It was
discussed and determined that the new requirement is effective for the May 2005
graduates in those program that have reduced their hours to 120. Stephens reminded the Council that she has
encouraged all departments to look at their programs and noted that degree
reductions do not have to have
3. 60% Rule
Stephens asked that the Registrar’s Office check all programs that are not within the 60% upper level credit hour guideline. Academic Council will be advised of the results and be on the agenda at the next meeting or when a report is ready.